Rafael Leao, in all likelihood, could return to France at the end of the season. This was revealed by a market expert.
Emanuele Gamba, journalist for La Repubblica spoke at the microphones of TVPlay to reveal some interesting market rumors: for the journalist, Rafael Leao could be Mbappé’s replacement at PSG, but only under certain precise conditions.
Gamba does not take it for granted that Kylian Mbappé will leave PSG: “I would remain more cautious about this, although the news that has been coming in the last few days suggests otherwise. We are still waiting for the situation to evolve. For the rest, it is difficult to name a replacement. Certainly PSG has changed its philosophy and has no longer taken names but has invested in young people.”
For the journalist, the problem is that lately the French club has not guessed the right shots. “For example, it has spent a lot of money on Goncalo Ramos and Kolo Kuani but so far has gotten practically nothing in return. So I expect them to go for a fresh, young and powerful striker in the case.”
“Rafael Leao could certainly be one more solution for PSG, but in France they expect something more prestigious,” Gamba continued.
Leao away from AC Milan: “In France they want him at PSG, but they prefer others. “
“We need a different shot, beyond tactical consideration. Leao does not have the right target because he is 24 years old and no longer very young. By international standards he should already be mature, and he is not. For PSG to spend so much on a player who is still not clear when he is worth is not worthwhile. I expect something more interesting to be discovered. “
And according to the interviewee, the most interesting shot could be Kvaratskhelia. “For example, Kvaratskhelia would be good. He or such a player. But also Osimhen, because he is a sure value. Alternatively, a Sesko-like profile or even someone like Musiala, who is not a striker but would be a similar deal to Bellingham with Real Madrid. Someone like that would be an investment for the future and not just an expense.”
According to the journalist, Juve was not disappointing against Inter: “Juve was Juve. It was wrong for those who expected something different, I think few expected it to be able to stay in the game until the end. In the end the second half was not balanced but more of a one-sided first half. There is nothing new to say after yesterday’s game. Allegri is much criticized because people say he could have tried to play with a swagger right away … So at least you lose with courage, the effect is the same anyway.”
“It is a fair reasoning, but it does not belong neither to the characteristics of Allegri nor of the club and fans,” the interviewee concluded. “It was much more serious the two points lost to Empoli where one had to take risks and not settle for not losing while against Inter he did what everyone does and it went wrong. “